@ Mikrucio
You're right, looking at the specs is a bad idea. The Amiga 500 was capable (and still is) of more than most people would give it credit for, hence its popularity during its short lifespan. However, if you look at the capabilities of the PS2 compared to the GC or the Xbox, it's simply not up to snuff. I'm not an Xbox fanboy, I own both the GC and the Xbox, and have quite often considered buying a PS2, if only for the FF and GT series. But simply stating the PS2 is the most powerful is quite ignorant and 'fanboyish' if I may say so. The PS2 was released a full year (if not more, not sure of the dates, I think it was August 2001?) ahead of the GC and Xbox. This lead, and its backwards compatibility with the PS1 games and hardware (controllers etc) led to the 80 million to 20 million figures you speak of. Nobody in their right mind goes out to buy a PS2 for its hardware, they buy it for its games, and Sony has brilliant 3rd party support. PS2 games look good, but take a look at a multi-platform game, and the PS2 will always come out worst, even though most of the time its developed on PS2 hardware and ported using Renderware, so your argument about the Xbox being easy to develop for is pretty much rendered (excuse the pun :-D ) useless there.
The point is, all three consoles have their positives and negatives, so there's no point looking at hard evidence and swearing that exactly the opposite is true.
(BTW, your comments about Halo MUST be purely to start a flame war, because nobody is that blind.)
Anyway, go back to your trolling if you must :lol:
