AINC VS HYPERION - Hyperion Lost?

[Louis Dias]

Looks like the chips are stacking up against KMOS (aka AmigaDon'tCare)...

As one of the most vocal defenders in the threads on amigaworld.net...and even to the point of being temporarily banned from posting by a TOTALLY biased moderator...

Edited by Argo : obscene smileys

...no I'm not bitter...

[Louis Dias]

Atheist wrote:
Actually, there are 2 reasons why a court appointed settlement can't work.

Amiga Inc. Wa. no longer has the contract, and the company that DOES, their name isn't on the contract. Only the original Amiga Inc. Wa. can be the owner. (Amiga Inc. Wa. will cease to be on Sep. 28, 2008? Or should I say Amino LLC? BTW, what great products does Amino LLC Wa. make??!?!?! Website? WHO works there?)

2nd thing is, Hyperion Entertainment in NO way, shape or form has an obligation to have to pay their lawyer's fees due to KMOS's (MKOS?) action against them. They're the equivalent of an unconcerned party bringing a lawsuit into court.

Will Amiga Inc. Del. (if they're allowed to hold that name) pay H.E.'s court costs? I think not!

When you initiate a law suit and lose, the defending party can recover their court costs from you in the USA.  This was implimented to stop frivilous lawsuits that were so common at one time...

[Louis Dias]

Atheist wrote:

lou_dias wrote:

When you initiate a law suit and lose, the defending party can recover their court costs from you in the USA.  This was implimented to stop frivilous lawsuits that were so common at one time...

Hi lou_dias,

Hmmmmm, well, in a court appointed settlement, is there a "winner" and "loser" for money to be paid out for lawyer's fees of one side over another? I guess there never really was a trial as some kind of settlement occurs with both walking away, both feeling like they've lost. So both pay their own fees?


Frankly in my opinion, Amiga Inc. Del. is a fraud, as they have NOTHING holding them back from releasing AOS5 onto a starving hungry world! Well, other than it doesn't exist?

I haven't read even one sentence anywhere of HE opposed to AOS5.0 being sold, anyhow. HE never opposed AmigaAnywhere2 being distributed.

Well I don't think you get your costs back in the case of a settlement because it's like saying, as the defense, that you are partially wrong in this...

Also, I have no idea who HE is...and I don't think the world is so hungry anyway.  I have gotten a taste of open-source software (OpenOffice, Thunderbird, Mozilla) and it is good...combine that with an Amiga-like OS that boots up in seconds and we have a winner.

[Louis Dias]

weirdami wrote:
@lou_dias

I agree with your sentiment regarding AW.net's moderators, but all those mean graphics are being directed at me when I look at them. :-(

What is your username there?  And I believe I specified no one in particular but just generally the condsending, elitist know-it-all side that can't accept alternate possibilities to outcomes they never had any control over.

I said early on that if the ITEC contract is "in accordance with the 2001 contract" then those rules apply.  Then I got a beatdown saying that it's simply "no, it's I pay $25,000 and you give me OS4."  Seems the judge agreed with the former angle.