Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: File system differences  (Read 3375 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kvasir

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2004
  • Posts: 249
    • Show all replies
    • http://watertonian.freeiz.com/1200brag/index.html
Re: File system differences
« on: January 10, 2011, 02:21:42 AM »
Quote from: runequester;605268
So far I am quite happy with FFS, but I know a lot of people use either SFS or PFS. What are the advantages associated with the two, compared to the old FFS, and under what circumstances is it worth switching?


I use SFS, and am pretty happy with it. Think it needs 020+, though (060 here). Haven't played with PFS, though. Oh, no more waiting for a 4GB FFS partition to validate because this beast decided to crash during an HDD write. Seems alot faster, too. I remember even loading Doom2 on FFS took forever, unless I used addbuffers to allocate an obscene amount of memory to it. SFS is MUCH quicker. Also seems faster with emulation using hardfiles then on native file-systems.
--
Amiga 1200T 68060 50MHZ 192MB Fast
 40GB IDE, 100MB Zip, CD/RW, DVD/Rom
 Mediator+ 4MBSVGA, Soundblaster, 100mbps Ethernet
 Subway USB+ endless list of gadgets :-D
My full specs