Speelgoedmannetje wrote:
PMC wrote:
Anyway, just because someone's gay doesn't mean that they're in any way a threat to you. Gay people have been known to have happy and monogamous relationships too...
Why should one have a monogamous relationship? As long as ppl are honest to each other, I do not see ANY problem in polygamous relationships.
Or is this again an aspect of the victorian romantic view of the realizable world?
I think you are having trouble with translating the verb.
"have been known to have" means that Some gay people - like everyone else - are capable of "happy and monogamous relationships". It doesn't mean they HAVE to be this way.
when San Francisco had that run on marriages a few months ago, I heard the 1st couple to get married had been together 50 years. and they were not alone. So, it's not uncommon.
that sentence doesn't insist monogamy is "normal", better or the only way to go. it's just not unusual.