You're missing the point.
There really is no point to this argument.
Kronos is claiming that even a small percentage of an established market base is significantly larger than one that doesn't yet exist. Investing in a USD$200 software solution is likely to be more appealing than USD$1000 in new hardware.
Quoting ~1700 copies of Amithlon sold is a piss poor way of going about it. That's a pathetic number.
There are 600 million PCs out there. Even if .001% of these were capable of running an x86 version of OS4 and some of these users were willing to pay for it, the install base would be huge.
Who's willing to do the work in the same manner as Hyperion is doing? I don't recall ANYONE offering to do the work. Unless there is someone willing to do this, all these "x86 is a better choice" discussions are pointless, because the product won't be a reality.