Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?  (Read 4152 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« on: November 01, 2006, 05:12:32 PM »
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20061031-054116-9407r

 :lol:

What the hell did they think they were going to see, kisses and cuddles like Care Bears the Movie?

Just saw it now, and yes there was one scene that was quite grim. I reckon if I hadn't seen the real-life equivalent of it, I would probably have felt a bit uncomfortable.

I am waiting for the Nanny State to pull the film.  :roll:
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2006, 08:25:29 PM »
@ Cyberus

Definitely!
In fact I first heard about that fainting business on a South African radio broadcast this morning (I listen to the Highveld audiostream while I tinker with graphics etc).
And it was because of that news item that I made sure I saw the film today (before it gets a few extra cuts or maybe even pulled altogether).
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2006, 10:13:04 PM »
@ Karlos

Ja, I enjoyed it a lot, and I would have enjoyed it even more if I didn't have so much real-life gore experience.

But...there are crucial references to events that took place in Saw I and II, so you shouldn't make number III your first one.
Overall, the original Saw was the best, closely followed by this one. Number II wasn't so good because they made a very bad casting decision with the guy they tried to palm off as a force to be reckoned with, as an antagonist to the evil guy. (Yeah it sounds silly but I can't really describe how they made the casting mistake without giving away the plot).

My advice is to see the original Saw and then decide if you want to see the other two, with the knowledge that number II is going to be a minor let-down and number III is really meaty.
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2006, 10:47:29 PM »
@ Adz

"...Details??? I can handle reading about this stuff, but I really cannot bare to watch it..."
-----------------------------------------------------------

You don't have to be bare mate, it's not that kind of movie  :-P

I can give you details in PM, cos otherwise it will be a plot spoiler. All I can say is that I saw the real deal being done in a hospital and the Saw scene was a reasonable reproduction.
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2006, 05:18:36 PM »
@ Vinnie

Ja, it is the goriest of the lot. If you've seen I and II then you should see III.
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2006, 09:43:32 PM »
@ Vinnie

Awww, it looks like they edited the one you saw  ;-)
 

Offline X-rayTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 4370
    • Show all replies
Re: Saw III - Soon to be withdrawn or censored?
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2006, 11:44:40 PM »
@ Vinnie

No mate, I was joking. You are probably just strong-stomached, or we made unrealistic expectations with all the talk beforehand.