@ Karlos
My view is that there were arguably negative and positive consequences of the coalition action in Iraq. One of the undisputed benefits was that this particular player could safely go to the Games, participate in them AND SAFELY GO BACK to Iraq. This was never an option for him before. So yes, I find it at the very least a churlish comment that he would stand there in his sports clothes at the Games and say that if he wasn't there he would be at home shooting Americans.
You mention Abu Graib: well that relates to the abuse of prisoners of war and unless this footballer is a POW on a pass I think he'll be okay when he gets back. The other thing to remember is that the atrocities are not one-sided there. American contractors, civilians, just doing their jobs and not having any military role whatsoever have been beheaded in Iraq. So what I'm trying to tell you is that both Iraqis and Americans have suffered in Iraq, but if you look at the overall intent and attitude that the coalition forces have towards Iraqi civilians, I find it unacceptable that one of their civilians uses the Games as a platform to state that he would have been back home shooting Americans when it is the coalition forces who have made it possible for him and many other Iraqi civilians to enjoy some of these very basic freedoms for the first time.
"..I'm sorry if you find these views offensive..."
No, my mate, I am not offended, we are just having a conversation and it is clear that we have different views, that's all. And I don't think either one of us is going to bring the other around to his way of thinking.