Rumble in the Jungle 2002

[KennyR]

Let's not turn this into another trolling contest. Personally I don't like MOS, or the people behind it, and I'd rather have OS4. But to say MOS isn't Amiga related is wrong, much like it is wrong to say that OS4 is vaporware done by people who know nothing about the Amiga.

So let's wait and see how the competitors do against each other. Flame x86 instead ;-)

[KennyR]

Fact: MOS looks and feels like an Amiga. Most people using it would not be aware of any difference between it and a classic Amiga, except speed and some small trade-ins for legacy compatibility for new features. It feels more like a real Amiga than UAE does. It is a native AmigaOS, just without the Amiga sticker slapped on the front. I don't think MOS is the route for me, but whether I like MOS or not, I refuse to lie about it.

Have you ever actually *tried* MOS? If not, your whole argument is completely meaningless, in the same way the arguments of people who have never used a real Amiga for many years are meaningless against OS4 and the AmigaONE.

[KennyR]

For my part I refuse point-blank to defend either AInc or bplan. They both have had, and still do have, personal agendas which not only make it impossible for them ever to see eye to eye again, but I'm pretty sure they aren't in either my nor the Amiga's best interests.

Let 'em fight it out with hardware and software, not words.