Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Is HD speed that important  (Read 3970 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show all replies
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Is HD speed that important
« on: September 22, 2003, 08:39:48 PM »
Yes, HD speed makes the world of difference. Even on a system without VM, it makes the whole system feel more responsive. In a world of steadily increasing code size, any interface that uses CPU time to poll it is dead, dead, dead - and with good reason.

As to SCSI vs IDE, it's pretty established that modern SCSI is better in almost every way than modern IDE. The actual interfaces don't have much difference, although SCSI has a slight technical advantage still (although transfers use no CPU time on SCSI or UDMA-IDE, drive commands still do on IDE. SCSI is also better with multiple devices).

What's more important to remember is that SCSI drives are built to server specs and have far better components and technology than IDE drives, which are generally only built to desktop specs. The only IDE drive which could claim to come close to server level is the Western Digital Raptor, and it falls quite seriously short of the big boys at the top.
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show all replies
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Is HD speed that important
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2003, 09:17:08 PM »
The line between luxury and necessity usually depends how patient you are and what you want to do. ;)

But supposing you got a coldfire (just for the sake of argument) for an Amiga and wanted to watch some divx. The coldfire might be able to play it, but the drain on it caused by the Amiga IDE would make watching divx impossible.