N7VQM wrote:
Did you forget about the last sentence of my post or did you ignore it?
Sorry, my eyes saw "thermal" there and not athermal.
It's not yet known just how RF feilds below the ionization level affect biologicial mechnisms. And, while the chemical soup in the brain is a decent conductor, it is not a good inductor.
True.
If it was, I doubt we would have survived this long concidering the RF pulses created by lightning strikes.
True as well. But... Anecdotal evidence would suggest that those close are knocked unconcious even without having any of the current pass through their bodies. It could be the blast wave and/or the flash and bang as well, of course.
There's also reason to believe that EM fields disrupt the mental processes. Experiments with magnetic fields along the brain causes subtle mood changes or memory recollections. Until there's evidence to the contrary, I'll do the opposite of everyone else and assume that cellphones and other EM transmitters can actually affect the brain. When people are making money out of dismissing unproven science, its usually a safe bet that the science is right and that they are wrong. How many years did the tobacco industry deny smoking caused cancer?