takemehomegrandma wrote:
... perhaps "evidence" is a too "stong" word for describing material in an already closed and settled case? ... IMO, this seems to be more like a correspondence discussion ...
Considering the wording used in the new docs, this is an appeal for declaration and discrediting one or two bits of evidence. They do have that right to appeal a courts decision so long as there is significant evidence and support backing a claim. If it's nothing more than fabricated documentation, it will be thrown out and the ruling will stand.
:pint:
