Boot_WB wrote:
Didn't see the sig, so can't comment, ... so it must have been pretty bad to have triggered being banned.
There was nothing offensive about the sig, it was only evangelically religious in nature. The debate about Nicholas signature should have been in CH/Politics, where he requested those questioning his sig move the debate. His new account name was only to show his break with his past due to his religious conversion and reforming his life.
