AB3D: Ok when you didn't have a PC and Doom.
AB3D2: I don't care how amazing technically this game was, even on a Ninja Amiga, it wasn't capable of giving good frame rate. Also, I thought Genetic Species looked cleaner. As for bump mapped sprites etc., like you could really appreciate that on an AGA display :| Doom still looked a hundred times better
Fears: Horrendous. I'd have been disappointed with this on a NES
Gloom: Simple SEU. I liked it. First Amiga game I had that made me think Doom was a possibility. As for the guy who said it was unique as there was nothing like it on the PC....WHAT??? Ok, maybe there wasn't a FPS on PC as simple, but for me Gloom was like Doom's predecessor Wolfenstein.
Doom: Say what you like, and I never played it on Amiga until my Amiga was Ninja (in Amiga terms at least) but when I first played Doom on a friends PC I thought it ruled. When I got it on Playstation, and linked to a friends PS, I thought it ruled. When I played it on my own PC, I decided it was antiquated, I'd just bought a 3dfx card and had been playing Quake 1 for a bit. When I played ADoom on my Amiga, it was nostalgic, reminding me that a game if nothing else, is supposed to be fun. It was also the first time I saw crisp decent FPS on my Amiga.
Genetic Species: Well, for an Amiga, it was ok. I kinda liked it, almost like 3D Paradroid. So the graphics weren't particularly impressive (in fact it looked just as good in AGA 320x250 as it did at 640x480 on Picasso)
Nemac IV and the others I never played or wanted to, because by this time I was pretty much consigned to the fact that my PC was A) considerably more capable than my Amiga B) Considerably cheaper than my Amiga C) Less hassle to upgrade in order to play a recent game release
