Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts  (Read 12276 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #14 from previous page: January 21, 2005, 09:16:33 PM »
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2005, 06:27:32 PM »
@Dal

Got it here.  4.20 is the version I was able to compile, but since 2.03's nameservice stuff was wonky I never really got it to work right.  2.1 isn't having those same problems.  And congrats on getting Apache compiled!

@Crusher

Well, you could put the stuff on CD, but since AMIX cannot read CDs it would be a bit futile :-/
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2005, 12:42:59 AM »
Yeah, seen that one.  If you get that error, make a build directory in there, and run configure from there.  ie:

mkdir build && cd build && ../configure +your config arguments
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2005, 03:00:56 AM »
Hiya, are you trying to run all your configures in sh?  Try running them in ksh.  I seem to recall having better luck with the "can't do cd ." with that in 2.03.  I will try the NTP stuff once I get done failing at compiling Lynx :-)

One of the "exciting" things about AMIX is that things fail to compile in different ways based on what compiler I use.  It's actually rather amusing.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2005, 04:47:35 AM »
Quote

Dalamar wrote:
I have noticed that too.  I did update the Wiki for NTP.  It looks like it needs automake 1.7 which needs Perl5.  Ug.  I'm out of my league on this one. :lol:


Dude, what were you doing?  Configure ran fine for me?

Compilation is progressing and I expect it to complete since it did on 2.03, hopefully the result will work better (2.03 compiled one could not figure out DNS names)

@greg

That's really interesting, I was under the impression that there was zero third-party software for AMIX.  Do you think you could upload that to the wiki site for us to play with?
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2005, 02:22:15 PM »
@greg

No rush, I don't even know Cobol...although back in the day I had a Cobol compiler for C64.

@dal

Well I need to recompile it, because it thought I was cross-compiling and it prepended "amix-" to all the filenames.  It's because I spec'd build/host/target as "amix" to configure, which works for most everything, but it detected them as "m68k-unknown-sysv4".  I guess I'll just spec the full m68k-cbm-sysv4 from now on.  But take a look at this:

[color=0000ff]
# ./amix-ntpdate timex.peachnet.edu
Looking for host timex.peachnet.edu and service ntp
host found : ns2.usg.edu
27 Jan 09:17:09 amix-ntpdate[29836]: step time server 131.144.4.9 offset 31622915.058509 sec
[/color]

It does DNS lookups properly :-D
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #20 on: January 28, 2005, 05:20:10 PM »
Yes, 9697 days...see, my 3000UX has no battery, so when it comes up it thinks it is sometime in 1970.  I reset the date using the date command, and AMIX's rather simple-minded uptime mechanism just went ahead and assumed the system had been up that long :-)  A reboot sets things right again, as long as I don't turn the power off.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #21 on: January 29, 2005, 06:45:12 PM »
When you get back, you'll have bash 3.0 waiting for you.  I fixed some bad defines and it compiled just now (literally 2 mins ago).  Woo!

No such luck with gcc beyond 2.7.2.3, all have assembler errors building stage1 libgcc2.a.  And that's after I fixed collect2.c.

*edit*

[color=0000ff]gcc -L./builtins -L./lib/readline -L./lib/readline -L./lib/glob -L./lib/tilde -L
./lib/malloc -L./lib/sh    -O2 -o bash shell.o eval.o y.tab.o general.o make_cmd
.o print_cmd.o  dispose_cmd.o execute_cmd.o variables.o copy_cmd.o error.o expr.
o flags.o jobs.o subst.o hashcmd.o hashlib.o mailcheck.o trap.o input.o unwind_p
rot.o pathexp.o sig.o test.o version.o alias.o array.o arrayfunc.o braces.o brac
ecomp.o bashhist.o bashline.o  list.o stringlib.o locale.o findcmd.o redir.o pco
mplete.o pcomplib.o syntax.o xmalloc.o -lbuiltins -lsh -lreadline -lhistory -lte
rmcap -lglob -ltilde -lmalloc lib/intl/libintl.a   -lsocket -lnsl -ldl
ls -l bash
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root      734308 Jan 29 13:43 bash
size bash
501144 + 28364 + 22112 = 551620
root@motoko:/usr/src/bash-3.0/build# ./bash
bash-3.00#[/color]

Had to fix the bolded thing, defined getwd/getcwd wrong for AMIX.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #22 on: January 29, 2005, 09:35:21 PM »
Replying to myself...AMIX uses a deprecated trap designation in /etc/profile so CTRL-C stops working with bash 3.0, I added a section like this for bash shells:

[color=0000ff]if [ "$BASH" ]
then
  PS1='\u@\h:\w\$ '
  trap - 2 3
fi
[/color]

Setting it this way keeps the deprecated form intact for the old shells.  The PS1 line isn't necessary, it sets my prompt to "Debian style" the way I likes it :-)
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2005, 07:16:06 PM »
Well, wanted to resurrect this thread again to let you know that I was able to compile a web browser (Lynx) on AMIX after fixing a few compile problems.
In fact I am using it to enter this post.  So, I can verify that amiga.org is ok for text-only browsers :-)
I have been able to get lots of new stuff compiled for 2.1, but a web browser was something I really wanted.  Woo!
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP
 

Offline FailureTopic starter

  • Lifetime Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2004
  • Posts: 332
    • Show all replies
    • http://awhitlock.net/
Re: Exciting but cryptic announcement for AMIX enthusiasts
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2005, 05:46:13 AM »
Hey, well no not really in your case.  If you can make a new tape (or verify yours still works) before you install you can save yourself a lot of grief.  I actually made three copies before attempting it myself.  You may want to run a cleaning tape through the drive too...mine was filthy.

IIRC, the install script won't go stomp on AmigaDOS partitions, but be careful during the install process :-)

As an aside, there has been some behind the scenes activity on my end re: AMIX.  I have the contents of the mmhart.com site (manuals, etc), as well as the X11R5 patches for AMIX, and a variety of other things.  Another individual has provided scripts to create install tapes from Linux (verified working).  He is going to help me revamp the site a little bit, and for my part I plan to get the files uploaded by this weekend.
You can\'t spell evil without "vi"
AMIX Wiki | AmixBP