AROS Public License clearly allows that. Furthermore the MorphOS Team has contributed their changes back to AROS.
Now you mention it, I was never satisfied how the AROS code was handled by the MorphOS Team; especially how an AROS Team member (Georg Steger) had to dig through your code to get the code back into AROS.
The least you could have done is make an archive of the APL covered code on a regular basis for the AROS people to port back what they wanted.
And I also guess in the last years no bug fixes have been done in the APL code as I haven't seen anything coming from MorphOS in a long time. IMHO it is your task to obey the APL license and we should not have to beg for it.
Of course, as an open source guy I would prefer it if you would open source the full libraries that contain APL code; but like you said that is not a requirement of the APL license.
greets,
Staf.
