Look at this quote:
Unfortunately, the typical response of a Linux user to SCO's claims has been to dismiss them. They criticise SCO for even hinting that Linux could be anything other than perfectly legal and clean, and support actions such as the recent denial of service attack on the SCO website.
And this is where this author is so wrong. Most important people in the linux community have always stated that they want to remove all code from the kernel which is not legally there. If SCO wants to cooperate they even want to help trace down the wrong code and take the necessary actions.
