Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?  (Read 14053 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 1221
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.wiehltalbahn.de/en/
Re: The Workbench 3.1 natural successor?
« on: May 19, 2010, 11:13:51 AM »
Quote from: save2600;544470


OS3.9 is really nice - but in my experience and usage, I do not like running it on anything less than an 040. It felt pretty slow on my 40mhz 030 equipped A1200 when I had it and I recently installed 3.9 on my 25mhz A3000 - to which I quickly un-installed it and went back to 3.1.
...



Hmmmm - I mainly use OS 3.9 on my A4000PPC. On the 68060@50mHz the speed is quite acceptable, but this may be due to the fact that my harddrives are attached to the UW-SCSI host adapter.

Initially I had an HD attached to internal IDE and that way the system was not so responsive. So I switched to SCSI and disabled the IDE...

I also have an 40mhz 030 equipped A1200 with OS 3.9., but haven't used it for years. I can remember that it was of course slower than the A4k, but I would think dropping the IDE in favour of an SCSI host would most likely speed up the system equally.
All the best,

Dandy

Website maintained by me

If someone enjoys marching to military music, then I already despise him. He got his brain accidently - the bone marrow in his back would have been sufficient for him! (Albert Einstein)