James wrote:
So I make a post about a BBS and in five minutes I get people telling me to take my "illegal activities" elsewhere.
Yet here we have a guy who breaks the EULA from two PC softwares by decompiling the packages to rip the resource files, in order to use them without permission in another software. And then goes on about breaking two more EULA on Amiga by hacking new resources in old softwares.
And this is ok?
You surely mean Copyright infringement and not breaking the EULA?
After all the original Eye of the Beholder (I and II) did not in fact have an EULA. Well, my original copies sure don't have an EULA included anyway.
Apologies for straying of the topic a tad.
