real amiga vs winuae

[koaftder]

My custom computer built around a pic18f processor cold boots in under 70ms and begins displaying the temperatures from single wire thermal sensors distributed around my apartment to a vt220 terminal therefor it's more powerful than any Amiga, PC, Mac, or Ti calculator. I have you all beat.

[koaftder]

Ok, With this example Karlos does actually win! He has found the simplest  useful binary computer that we probably all have in our own homes!

He hasn't won yet! There is a delay between flipping the switch and getting the result. I have such an arrangement in my apartment. We're going to have to measure the length of the wire runs to get to the bottom of this.

[koaftder]

This has faster response time than torch, assuming torch is uk dialect for flashlight as we call it in US. (shorter runs)

[koaftder]

Ok, I just thought of something. Something that beats it all. A piece of glass with uranium oxide diffused in it and check this, in outer space, with sunlight shining on it at all time. Blam, no startup time. Always on, for billions of years. It fluoresces as UV photons hit the uranium oxide molecules. Faster than the Amiga, PC, Mac, Ti calc and my pic18f. Never needs a reset. Top that.

[koaftder]

Fake diamonds throw off more colors than real ones. Kind of how I can play Faery Tale Adventure on UAE with the floppy drive sped up instead of waiting 3 seconds every time bad guys pop up in the field while I'm hoofing it through the map. The game accesses disk every time it decides to throw baddies, maybe to load sprites? It's imperceptable on UAE. Emulation in this case is better than the real hardware.

[koaftder]

Your behavior was that of a PC-fanatic.  Not familiar with Pegasos-- does that have amiga h/w or just all software emulation?

[koaftder]

[koaftder]

Okay, so you didn't have to serve as the sidekick.  
I will only state one and see if you are emotional sane enough to acknowledge it.  The very first point about joysticks you said my data was "utter rubbish".  If that's not a biased look at the data, then I can't even argue with you anymore.

I wouldn't call your data rubbish. I'm from the southern United States, the closest I can call it is, "crap" and not violate the site rules. You ran a task on the machine that polled the port while a game was running. This guarantees the timing is completely inaccurate. But who knows right? You weren't even clear about whether this data came from sampling an atari or an amiga. Who cares though, you have less than 1ms state changes in your data. That's physically impossible from a biomechanic perspective. You measure signal bounce from the superior joy port hanging off a Denise chip who's input pins tie directly to mechanical switches.

[koaftder]

You are baised as well then.  You are one of those sick people who play pathological games on people by distorting their REP points by assuming YOU KNOW BETTER than them although you may be in more ignorance than the person you pass judgement on.  I don't give a crap about your REP bullcrap.

hahah! :laughing: You've sunk to all new lows. This is what you come up with when you can't admit that you sample signal bounce. Truly pathetic. You only got one -1 from me, I'd guess you got a lot from others. You deserved them all.

[koaftder]

You are baised as well then.  You are one of those sick people who play pathological games on people by distorting their REP points by assuming YOU KNOW BETTER than them although you may be in more ignorance than the person you pass judgement on.  I don't give a crap about your REP bullcrap.

I was mistaken in my previous response to this comment. I thought I had left amagiski a -1. Turns out I didn't. I had only dropped on negative, and took a screen capture of it when I did.



It's sad to see a useful site feature dropped because of a few cry babies who blame everyone else for their problems.