I still don't understand the overt bias against Microsoft products.
Sure, Windows is bigger than the 1985 AmigaOS. If you want to compare apples to oranges, that's fine, but comparing Apples to Apples would be comparing the size of OS 3.9 to Microsoft DOS 6.2 with Windows 3.0.
Will someone please figure it out and stop with the whole "slow, bloated" crap? If you integrated the exact same features and abilities in AmigaOS that are already present (and working) in Windows, then AmigaOS would be almost the same size. Well admittedly not the same size, but it would be damned close.
Wayne! Now you are just being plain silly! Nowhere near the same size! You can't compare Inefficient Programing with Efficient Programing!
-------------------------------------
"The Bloatware Debate" is a technical discussion of how two separate people dissected one particular Microsoft program and found out, to their shock, that it was over 2,000% larger than it should have been. It would appear from this discussion that the cumbersome size of Microsoft programs is due not only to the continually growing clutter of useless features but it is also due to careless programming (perhaps to an even larger degree).
http://www.kmfms.com/whatsbad.html-------------------------------------
