Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Hyperion's statement on litigation with Amiga Inc.  (Read 6490 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: terminology ununderstanding
« on: May 02, 2007, 02:07:12 PM »
Quote
Something what should have took months has dragged on for years, That is what i would call bad coders.

What the hell have you been smoking now? You certainly know NOTHING about developing if you think it takes months to rewrite big parts of an OS and port it to a completely different architecture.
Why does it even take years for big companies like microsoft with literally unlimited resources? It took them actually years to push out Windows Millenium, which was in fact a smaller change than os4 is to os3.1. It also blowed {bleep} and was actually a downgrade.

Why not join Aros or something if you believe you can actually help them finish the OS in just a few months.
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: terminology ununderstanding
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2007, 02:58:00 PM »
Quote
Yes but microsoft does not make a ass out of themselves by keep claiming the product will be out in "two weeks" again and again for years and making stupid pathetic excuses when they deliver zilch time and time again.

I have never seen hyperion claim anything like that. I have however seen Amiga inc making similar press releases saying that OS4 and hardware is supposed to be out within weeks, even though the OS dev had not even started yet.
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: terminology ununderstanding
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2007, 02:59:48 PM »
Quote
Hilarious that you should say that, because it's the Friedens who said it would take five months to complete OS4. Their estimate is in the court documentation.

Like i already said before, i think it is silly of them to agree on something like that, as they should have known it was simply not possible.
 

Offline Tomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show all replies
Re: terminology ununderstanding
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2007, 02:59:49 PM »
Odd, i clicked "post comment" just once and still i got a double post?