Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's  (Read 5284 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline madgrizzle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 189
    • Show all replies
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« on: September 19, 2017, 07:10:12 PM »
Quote from: Oldsmobile_Mike;830820
Obvious question, but can the Plipbox handle such speeds (assuming you have one of the high speed parallel port cards)?  Has anyone tested this with one?


I was looking for a way to move the plipbox inside my Amiga 2000 and have been on the lookout for an IO card so I had easy access to a parallel port.  One was up on eBay and I bought it.  If no one else does, I will report back on my testing results when I get the card.  I have to read this:

http://lallafa.de/blog/2015/09/amiga-parallel-port-how-fast-can-you-go/
Only Amiga *woo-woo* Makes It Possible
Only Amiga   ... Makes.. It .. Happen!
Amiga 2000, 2MB Chip RAM, OS3.9, GVP Combo 030/22 13 MB, Supra 4MB
Amiga 3000, 16 MB RAM, OS3.9, A3640 v3.2 with 060 Processor, Picasso II, A2065, PCD-50B
Dead VA2000/CX :(
 

Offline madgrizzle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 189
    • Show all replies
Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2017, 02:53:58 PM »
Quote from: amiadudeorwat;830868
I don't understand why someone would buy a Zorro Parallel card then plug an also very slow plipbox into it.  

You can get an X-surf for a little more that is five times faster.


Because why not?  I have a plipbox already and thought it would be a fun project to do.
Only Amiga *woo-woo* Makes It Possible
Only Amiga   ... Makes.. It .. Happen!
Amiga 2000, 2MB Chip RAM, OS3.9, GVP Combo 030/22 13 MB, Supra 4MB
Amiga 3000, 16 MB RAM, OS3.9, A3640 v3.2 with 060 Processor, Picasso II, A2065, PCD-50B
Dead VA2000/CX :(