In the beginning I started with an Amiga A600 that for me was it.
Then onto a 1200, I got myself a 486. I noticed a big difference between the two computers.
The Amiga did not throw wobblies or crash at the slightest thing.
With the Amiga you can actually get into it, for example the directories, C,L,S,Libs,Devs. nice and easy but a PC not a chance there is all sorts of stuff like system,system32, and all the Registery directories and all sorts of other before it will work.
On the Amiga I found AmosPro and that was and still is great to work with. For some reason I just find the Amiga far better to get on with.
A PC seems to be more hostile.
It just amazes me that when the Amiga first ever came out and I saw the first ever demo on a BBC program a A500 it was, it was years ahead of any PC of its day no matter what.
I use Amikit on my Athlon but for me you cant beat the real thing.
I am more than happy that I stuck with the Amiga over all this time. You ask any Amiga user the amount of fun they had or still are having with there Amiga. I use a PC, I have a good time with my Amiga.
Its just a great pity that the company of the day was as bad as there was, if they was not then the Amiga would be another story.
To be fair its not as fast as a modern day PC, but lets face it if the Amiga had the exact same power as a modern day PC I would dump the PC.
Its just sad how it ended up for the Amiga, a lot of fancy talk but nothing hard to back it all up. I mean nothing really serious to keep it going in the modern market.
I have spent a lot of money on my Amiga, why you may ask? When I could have put all that money on a really fast powerful PC? Because I find the Amiga worth it.
Simple as......
