Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's  (Read 5282 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pat the Cat

Re: Plipbox vs. conventional nic's
« on: February 20, 2017, 12:47:11 AM »
This talk of "it's as fast as the parallel port it uses" are a bit vague.

While  all "built in parallel" Amiga ports are bits of complex interface  adaptor design, how they are read and written is in part down to which  software driver the pilipbox is using.

I would guess you get about 25KB a second maximum, but that's kilobytes per second. So not too shabby.

The  hardware latches on 8520s will work reliably at 56K, but how close the  various releases of driver have got to that hardware limit, I've never  tested. 1.3 versions of parallel.device were very iffy and clumsy IIRC.  Presumably later ones are faster and more reliable.
 
Some Zorro  cards have much faster parallel ports than the standard, obviously,  which might outshoot the average 10Mb (Megabit) per second Plipbox. That  would to a certain extent still depend on the processor of the Amiga  used. For instance an A2000 is still a 7MHz computer even with a very  fast Plipbox and much faster parallel port.
"To recurse is human. To iterate, divine."

A1200, Vanilla, Surf Squirrel, SD Card, KS 3.0/3.z, PCMCIA dev
A500, Vanilla, A570, Rev 5, KS 1.2/1.3 Testbench system
Rasp Pi, UAE4ARM, 3D laser scanner, experimental, hoping for AmigaOS4Arm, based on Watterott Fabscan Pi