Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: The stupidity of search engines  (Read 5835 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JetFireDX

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 232
    • Show all replies
Re: The stupidity of search engines
« on: May 02, 2006, 05:48:09 PM »
While I agree that Google seems to be getting less relavante with a lot of the results from my searches, I don't think "this is it" is a good string to search for. Anytime I have used the word "and" in a search string, I am told in the results "and" is a common word and won't be used in the search... it seems to me that "this", "is", and "it" are all pretty commonly used too, so maybe Google's engine is confused on exactly what to show you, even if you do select the "exact phrase" option.

But, there have been several times in the last couple months where I have wanted to show somebody something that I didn't bother to bookmark and that I was easily able to find over and over in Google just by doing a search. Next time I looked for it nothing close come up again. I know I searched the exact terms again because FireFox's cache showed me it as an autocomplete in the field. Couldn't for the life of me fine any of it on Google. Went to Yahoo which I hadn't don in ages... first search, first page listed. Go figure.
 

Offline JetFireDX

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 232
    • Show all replies
Re: The stupidity of search engines
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2006, 06:13:52 PM »
Quote

mr_a500 wrote:
My point was that it shouldn't matter what is in the exact string, but it should be taken exactly as typed and only return results containing the string exactly as typed. If they're going to break it up and decide what is common or not, it is not exact.


I agree with you there, but perhaps using common words like that, even with "exact phrase" selected causes it to not do an exact search, it may be a bug. You might want to write them a report about it. It couldn't hurt afterall.

Another feature to be able to search with would be a tolerance setting for how close the words you searched for should be in a page... what good is it doing a search for some terms when they are used in 5 different unrelated places in a page spread out over 20 or 30 posts in a forum? Not very relevant. Something like "Find X,Y, and Z within 1 paragraph". I also wouldn't mind if the page results took more than 0.23 seconds to return all of the relevant hits. It's okay, take a full second and do a better job at searching. Using a second to find me better results is going to save me time over getting crap back in 0.23sec and having to do more searching.