Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Gary Hare , KMOS and OS4 ????  (Read 22997 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Gary Hare , KMOS and OS4 ????
« on: March 16, 2004, 04:46:02 AM »
Garry Hare wasn't, and isn't, Amiga Inc's CEO.

No apology from me.
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Gary Hare , KMOS and OS4 ????
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2004, 06:49:59 AM »
Probably why Amiga Inc. couldn't say a single thing over the past year, probably lots of non-disclosure stuff in this sale and everything...

Sad really ... does it make all those Ask Fleecys worthless? Is AG2 a myth? Is it the future of AmigaDE, not OS? Will we ever know? Will we care by then, or will we have migrated to other computer systems?
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Gary Hare , KMOS and OS4 ????
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2004, 08:26:20 AM »
Quote
they've got no proof that Bill Buck knew it was a forgery


Bill Buck presented it as a fact.

It was not.

End of story.

Anyway, for him to have seen the e-mail, he would have read the thread with all the "this is probably a hoax" messages.

And he didn't exactly contact Fleecy to get confirmation that it was him that posted it either.

So he knewingly, and willingly, submitted something he didn't know the authenticity of, as evidence. Most likely he knew it was forged. Of course, he wasn't betting on Amiga Inc. suddenly being able to disprove this. Looks like Amiga Inc. got a good poker hand at last!

Quote
Not one claim that it (AOS4) was planned to be forged from AmigaDE.


Which didn't happen. So it is irrelevant.
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Gary Hare , KMOS and OS4 ????
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2004, 12:09:34 PM »
Thanks, yes, that is true.

I was talking about the e-mail 'from' Fleecy that was on ANN recently that was actually a forgery, yet bbrv used it as evidence in the court case.