Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Why C= never made a 65816 based machine?  (Read 11240 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Why C= never made a 65816 based machine?
« on: August 06, 2012, 01:54:46 PM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;702467
And not talking specifically about Amigas, but as a C64/C128 successor. Seems like an obvious plan, full backwards compatibility with their 8 bit machines, plenty fast and cheap, up to 16 MB RAM, they were granted half of the licensing cost by WDC... Yet it never happend! And I think it would make for a very powerful entry level machine in the late 80s and early 90s... certainly more impressive than C65, which to me made little sense by 91'. A GUI based OS like GEOS could have been used/licensed by C=...


Commodore couldn't have managed their way out of a hat.

Content to sit back on their money earners, they stopped innovating and, surprise surprise, a few years later they were bust.

Just this morning I was thinking that C= should have reduced the C64 to a single chip (including the VICII,SID,6502,Serial,etc) by the late 80s so that they could sell it for cheap in developing countries for a profit. It could also have been clocked higher because said chip would have been fabricated on a far more modern process than the original C64. Your idea of using the 65816 is similar. An enhanced C64 for the late 80s/early 90s, with the C64's flaws (relatively slow CPU, mud-inspired colour palette) designed out.
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: Why C= never made a 65816 based machine?
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2012, 03:58:56 PM »
Quote from: mongo;702497
By the late 80s the production cost of the C-64 was about $25. It wasn't going to get much cheaper than that. Clocking it higher would have caused a ton of the software for it to not work and screwed up the video timing.

It could start up in compatibility mode, and switch to faster mode if the software desired it. It would have been a solvable issue. Anyway, all this proves is how much C= sat back on the C64 and then lost it all when the 8-bit market died overnight.