Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"  (Read 5848 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« on: August 15, 2002, 08:49:00 PM »
A pretty old article there.

AMD will be releasing benchmarks in October for the Clawhammer or the Sledgehammer. Presumably these will be running at full speed then.

FYI, a Clawhammer running in 32-bit mode (not 64-bit with all the extras) running the openssl speed benchmark at 800MHz performs between a 1GHz Athlon and a 1.4GHz Athlon. A 64-bit version, properly optimised, could run 4 times faster apparently (due to being able to reduce iterations by a factor of 4 because you have 64-bit integers to play with)! A 2GHz Clawhammer in 64-bit mode running this particular benchmark would perform like a 10GHz Athlon!

Of course, this is one single benchmark which can really benefit from going to 64-bit, most applications will see a 20% - 40% speedup over a similarly clocked Athlon.
 

Offline Hattig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 901
    • Show all replies
Re: SPEC CPU 2000(SpecInt) for AMD K8 "ClawHammer"
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2002, 11:56:44 PM »
AMD have not said that, some idiot on a website said that is would be 2.6GHz for 3400+. AMD have said nothing about clockspeeds for Hammer and how they relate to the performance rating. All they have said is 2GHz+ for 3400+ rating.

It looks likely that 2.2GHz will receive the 3400+ rating.

AMD are going to release the 2400+ and 2600+ Athlon TBred's next week according to The Inquirer. That is 2GHz and 2.133GHz. Intel will release the 2.8GHz P4 a week later.

Edit: Also, the G5 core controller chips (8500) run at 500MHz, so no wonder they perform a lot lower than the to be released desktop version! Probably have lot smaller caches, perhaps less execution units, etc.