Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X1000 looking good on paper?  (Read 35589 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: X1000 looking good on paper?
« on: October 15, 2010, 08:15:47 PM »
Quote from: mpiva;584913

Where's the evidence that this was an official Aeon demonstration.


Where's yours that Piru ever said or implied it?

Quote from: mpiva;584913

  At best, I'd say it's just some over zealous Amiga fan trying to unofficially advertise the X1000, at worst it could be you (though I doubt it) taking a picture in his basement intentially trying to make a mockery of the X1000.


Newsflash: The X1000 needs no help at all to be shown up as a joke.

Quote from: mpiva;584913

  At the VERY LEAST, you need to give proper references to your wild claims/photos.


You need to take a serious step back.

Piru so far as I can see in this thread has made no such claims whatsoever.
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: X1000 looking good on paper?
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2010, 10:36:33 PM »
Quote from: mpiva;584942
I DO claim that Piru was implying it.


DOX OR GTFO.

Quote from: mpiva;584942

Asking me to prove something's that's implied is nonsensical


Actually, it should be fairly easy to show how you came to your conclusion if there is even the slightest piece of validity to it.

Quote from: mpiva;584942
However, the fact that (so far) the vast majority of people responding to this thread seem to be assuming the very thing I claim Piru is implying speaks volumes.


There you go again, flailing away. The vast majority have done no such thing. They've just had a laugh at something that, on the face of it "official" or otherwise has great comedic value. Very few have made any comment on the matter beyond that.
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: X1000 looking good on paper?
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2010, 11:57:07 AM »
Quote from: Matteus;586163

Did someone says 64-bit OS? When did M$ come out with their first one? Was it 2003? There's yet to be a 64-bit browser that has a working flash player. 64-bit OS is a joke, unless you run Linux or something.


 Ahem.
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: X1000 looking good on paper?
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2010, 02:04:52 PM »
Quote from: Matteus;586338
That was released Sept 27 I think, remind me, when did Vista 64 bit come out? Just saying.


Because you couldn't possibly have ran a 32bit version of firefox or Opera, complete with the 32bit version of flash on either Vista64 or 7, right?

Writing off an entire 64 bit OS ecosystem because not all apps are 64 bit nor is there the need for them to be?

Seriously your complaint is a complete non issue. If you're building flash applications that are drawing more ram than a 32bit environment can offer, something somewhere in your program something has gone very, very awry. If by some coincidence you are actually coming across this, the question really has to be: Would what I'm building be better suited to some other programming language?
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]