Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ADPro vs. ImageFX  (Read 15869 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline T3000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 617
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.rcfreas.com
Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« on: March 01, 2010, 05:33:37 PM »
ADPro and ImageFX were both excellent in their day and usually both programs were in use. ImageFX however became better than ADPro at what it does over the years. Not many utilized ImageMaster as a batch processor.

ImageFX stayed Amiga based while the companys that produced ADPro and ImageMaster developed their product line for windows.
More information:
 ImageFX http://www.novadesign.com/2008/10/imagefx-45-studio-for-amiga.html Still in development!
[strike]ImageMaster[/strike], WinImages http://www.blackbeltsystems.com/ Funky interface, inexpensive, unlike the other image manipulation program for windows.
ADPro http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avid_Elastic_Reality Remembered as a forerunner in video image manipulation. (RIP)

Offline T3000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 617
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.rcfreas.com
Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2010, 04:58:44 PM »
Quote from: save2600;547686
Joking aside, I'm about to delve a little deeper into the ImageFX program, just for the fun of it. Will it or my 060 equipped A2500 handle a 25mb RAW file from my DSLR? My 2.1ghz G5 even chokes and gags a little with 'em! I'm not even going to try to edit a photo that large on an Amiga.  
....If it still works - use it!


Providing of course you don't expect it to perform beyond the capabilities of the machine and software. Typical graphic image file resolutions were around 1meg in size at the time.
Is there a RAW file loader for Ifx?
The 25mg file size might be pushing things especially if the G5 chokes. GigaMem might help Think that's what it's called, uses the HD for memory. Would be interesting to try...