Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Anyone working on PFS3 ??  (Read 18099 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline orange

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 2797
    • Show all replies
Re: Anyone working on PFS3 ??
« on: June 11, 2011, 08:38:59 PM »
I like pfs3 more than sfs because it can work even with 68000.
Logged
Better sorry than worry.
 

Offline orange

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 2797
    • Show all replies
Re: Anyone working on PFS3 ??
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2011, 12:45:50 PM »
Is there any chance of finally having a 'real' pfs3 defragmenter?
Logged
Better sorry than worry.
 

Offline orange

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 2797
    • Show all replies
Re: Anyone working on PFS3 ??
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2011, 01:24:13 PM »
Quote from: Piru;644071
I don't need to test it. I know it's technically impossible to partition a >2TB drive reporting 512 byte block size (that's what current drives do due to compatibility reasons). These drives will report more than 2^32-1 sectors and you cannot fit such number into 32bit data type (used by both TD_GETGEOMETRY and RDB itself).


hm, I wonder if that compatibility mode could be turned off;
because, with 4096 byte blocks, the limit would be 8*2Gb ?

I mean at least some new OS/software would be able to use largest drives without requiring new controllers?

plus the drives might be a bit faster.
Logged
Better sorry than worry.
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »