Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: 11 oscars = overrated  (Read 11733 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sumner7

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1172
    • Show all replies
Re: 11 oscars = overrated
« on: March 02, 2004, 01:35:23 PM »
There's no way that Lord of The Rings deserves 11 oscars. IT IS A CRAP FILM! :ranting:
 

Offline sumner7

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 1172
    • Show all replies
Re: 11 oscars = overrated
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2004, 08:30:39 PM »
Quote

mikeymike wrote:
Quote

Glaucus wrote:
Quote
AFAIK the Star Wars series haven't been given any oscars. Considering their staying power, I think that's a mistake. I can't think of anything they particularly excel at technically, so maybe one or two of them should have been given best film once.
I'd give them awards for special effects, but that's about it. The acting is nothing special, the story is fairly simple and linear, the directing style is boring and the screen writing is terrible. If anything should have won any awards it should have been the first one (episode 4), or perhaps the Empire Strikes Back.

I wouldn't say the screen writing is terrible, and I've seen worse (but not worse as in 'terrible') directing that is still classed as 'ok'.  They had to have got something right in order to be as popular now as the day they were released.
Quote
Episode 1 & 2 were crap! If you gave Lucas awards for them, you might as well give Star Trek movies best picture as well.

Agreed.


I agree too. Totally.  :afro: