Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?  (Read 13236 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rodney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1386
    • Show all replies
    • http://donthaveone.com/
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« on: September 16, 2003, 05:08:23 AM »
My favourite would have to be the A1200 because thats the first computer i owned.

I most pointless of all computers must have been the A600. I remember seeing it for the first time in a mag, either just before or after it was released, and there and then i couldnt imagine the stupidity of commador. I knew commador wasnt in the best of positions, but after seeing this, i knew commador was going down the drain.

Looking back, i dont think the CD32 was that hot either, its was good fun but it didnt seem as if it was a huge success. IT wasnt pusing any boundrys, it had the same chipset as the A1200 and A4000... (at least i think the A4000 chipset was the same)...

infact, anything after the A4000 wasnt that inovative. the A1200 was a home users A4000. The CD32 was the gamers, just because it didnt have a keyboard and a monitor. Commador should have been a lot more inovative. Lets face it, commador was prolly never inovative, they bought the Amiga and everyonen who were developing it. If they hadnt have done that, they would have died long before it. Because, they're not inovative!

They could have atleast stolen a few ideas, like MS :) it keeps them afloat! :)
We are not Humans having a spirital experiance
We are Spirits having a Human experiance.