Alans reply to Bill

[Rodney]

Wayne wrote:
It's interesting to see Alan coming out (if it really was him) with a blatant personal attack on Bill Buck where Bill Buck's comment was a sequence of events and was in no way a personal attack or "FUD" (I now loathe that stupid term).

I dont think anyone can try and pick whos right and whos  wrong, unless someone has some inside knowledge (although someone who has inside knowledge is most likly to be very bios).

As i see it there are two possibilities.

1) Alans being a retard and just trying to cover himself and trying to deflect BBRV's comments away from him.

OR

2) BBRV's events may have been right, but maybe, he really did piss off everyone else (and thats why MAI and TerrSoft left him) and Alan is defending himself, which he has every right to do so.

If the second senario is correct, then i dont think Alan was overboard, or harsh. Because if Bill did infact use Alans name missleadingly, i would have done the same thing in his shoes.

But, as i really have no idea whos right and whos wrong I'll just sit back and watch the show

[Rodney]

This post by Alan simply proves to me that both gentlemen would be better suited to working on their product than posting in public forums

Couldnt Agree more

although I still can't see anything wrong with BBRV's series of events post which would warrant such a reaction by Alan

Yes it was harsh, maybe alan was just sticking up for his pals, TerraSoftware and MAI. Maybe Alan thinks Bills posts abouts those companies has an indirect negative effect on his business, since MAI and TerraSoft are now the bad guys, according to Bill.

Anyway, i think this all boils down to dont take your business home, or at least, in this situation, dont bitch about it to your friends/followers or cultmembers...

That goes for both sides of the story. Alan maybe just should have left it.