It seems they felt it was an issue. Nobody like to lose money...NOBODY.
The Xbox project was a calculated risc, top management of MS knew that. To get into the market you need to spent money. With the Xbox 1 the got into the market. With Xbox 360, the are getting ready to make money of the Xbox project.
If Xbox 1 failed, MS might have pulled the plug on the Xbox project.
MS could afford to take this risk. Hardly anybody can take on Nintendo or Sony. Sega chickened out..
It may not sound smart to loose money on a project, but in a market as consoles you'd better be prepared to do so if you want to get in.
Also, you got any venture capital money that you can send my way to get this project going?
Your plan, your needs, your ideas, you get the money and work it out. Nobody NOBODY is willing to gamble on your idea. If anybody did, you wouldn't be here crying I want OS4 on Nintendo.
Go to a bank, or a VC. Give them your business proposal (You do have one do you ?). See if they want to gamble with you. I highly doubt that.
How can you accuse me of a troll comment when this thread is exactly about NOT using the A1 and using something cheaper
Because it was trolling. "There is no OS4, A1 hardware is buggy. The fix is useless". Talk to the A1 owners, most of them are happy wth their "unstable" boards.
You don't even know what the fix is. You believe it's a PCI IDE controller.
Oh, perhaps you can contact Acill. At least he was willing to put his money were his mouth was, getting OS4 ported to the Pegasos2. To bad the red trolls made it impossible. Maybe you can convince him in an port to nintendo
/edit
We're not paying Intel and Nvidia this time," he explained, referring to the exorbitant price paid out each time an Xbox was manufactured.
That doesn't say MS or even Holmdahl think that making a loss on the Xbox was an isue.
Holmdahl simply stated that Intel and Nvidia aren't getting money. The good reporter then added that Holmdahl is supposedly reffering to the "exorbitant price"..