- PFS3 is faster than SFS (easy to benchmark and verify as a fact)
- PFS3 fragments less than SFS over time (easy to verify as a fact)
- PFS3 has a repair tool, SFS doesn't (except MorphOS SFSDoctor)
- PFS3 is more reliable than SFS (somewhat subjective and harder to verify)
5. PFS3 allegedly multitasks better than SFS. This makes a lot of difference when 2 or more tasks try to access the HD simultaneously.
What SFS has going for it is the support for larger partitions than PFS3 (SFS: 128GB PFS3: 107GB)
Would I be allowed to hook a 2TB drive to my Amiga and PFSformat it into 20 different 100GB partitions?
