Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Is Amiga Emulation better than the real thing?  (Read 70806 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline coldfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 731
    • Show all replies
Re: Is Amiga Emulation better than the real thing?
« on: April 28, 2008, 10:24:13 AM »
UAE4all on GP2X = sublime.

Handheld Amiga Fun!

IMO, "better" than the real thing.
 

Offline coldfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 731
    • Show all replies
Re: Is Amiga Emulation better than the real thing?
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2008, 07:55:02 AM »
@foleyjo,

re:GP2X + UAE4all.

You have actually tried it, right?

btw;
- Loads of games work, the list grows with each update.
- Give me a handful of worthwhile games that use EHB and HAM as a crucial part of gameplay (not just title/loading screens)?
- Battery issue is way overstated, anyone with a good set of NiMH and a bit of mechanical sympathy is fine.

Even with these things you've mentioned, its very good having a hand held A500, not to mention Snes, MD, C64...

 :-P
 

Offline coldfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 731
    • Show all replies
Re: Is Amiga Emulation better than the real thing?
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2008, 03:52:39 PM »
@foleyjo

I disagree.

Being handheld alone makes it "better", not having to use floppies seals the deal, IMO.
 
 

Offline coldfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 731
    • Show all replies
Re: Is Amiga Emulation better than the real thing?
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2008, 07:35:33 AM »
@foleyjo

PS1 uses floppies?!?  LOL!

/deliberately obtuse mode off.