This is far from correct. In fact we are going through the process of assessing the PS3 for various 'non-gaming' applications...
Yeah, just as some people used PS2 clusters to do cheap vector processing. Still, I dont see any PS2-cluster based supercomputers on the top 500.
PS3 may contain a complete version of (Sony's) cell processor, but read more about the PPU and you'll quickly find it's a hobbled (reduced-transistor-count), G4-class design, hardly current desktop smashing material taken on its own. It remains to be seen how useful those 7 SPE's will be...
In any case, "Cell" is just an umbrella term used to cover an architecture not a single specific chip, so making statements about cell's physical attributes are a waste of time as Toshiba's and IBM's devices could be significantly different to anything Sony produces.
Anyone that thinks a PS3 is going to replace a desktop computer for doing desktop/workstation activities is just as crazy as Ken Kuturagi. Wasnt he the guy that said PS2 would render Toy Story gfx in realtime?