Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: C128 vs Apple IIc+  (Read 7081 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline drHirudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 539
    • Show all replies
    • http://hirudov.com
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« on: April 21, 2004, 08:08:24 AM »
The C128 is like 3 computers in one - C64, C128 and CPM box. It also had two processors (not dual working though) - 6510 and Z80 and it's like monster 8 bit machine, but came too late probably. The C128D desktop case is the same one used in the A1000, but in the computer world two 8 bits (or even three in this case aren't equal to one 16 bit). So I still prefer my A1000. Of course the C128 is better than the AppleIIc+ in hardware aspects, but if you look at the software base, you might find yourself more comfortable on the AppleII, except you are a hardcore gamer, who doesn't use the computers for anything else, and love to wait long diskloads (if you haven't installed fastloader). :-P

Offline drHirudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 539
    • Show all replies
    • http://hirudov.com
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2004, 04:11:26 PM »
The AppleIIGS is an unique machine, because it have backwards compatibility with the 8 bits Apples, thanks to the 65816 CPU, and it's still 16 bit and there was no split between the dudes with the 8 bit toys and the 16 bit "monsters" at the time. I can't imagine what it could have been if the Amiga was designed to be compatible with the C64 at first place.