debian hardinfo benchmarks

[drHirudo]

Because this is the truth, so people may know it.

Hail for Piru - the truth-bringer. The same Piru who brought the lie about the Amikit breaking laws by avoiding European warranty periods.

Oh, well. Whatever.

Link to the thread

[drHirudo]

drHirudo:
Trying to discredit the messenger with external and  irrelevant stuff

...and now *YOU* just tried to picture Piru as a liar, when all he did was posting a graph with data that *anyone* can verify. He did nothing more, nothing else, but that's obviously enough for you to try to discredit him in this foul way. But I dare you: Now it's up to you to back up your claims. Prove your claims of Piru being a liar, or stand exposed as the little troll you are.

Dude, I posted a link with proof in my post. The fact that he didn't edit his OP after being proved wrong makes him a liar. Imagine people from search engines coming to his threads and reading only the first few posts. They will have the feeling that Amikit is breaking law!

If he wanted to be neutral in this thread, he would have posted benchmarks from a recent X86 machine that will make his graphics on different scale and the measures of the difference between the different older CPU indistinguishable for regular observers, who don't care anyway. Yet he didn't, proving that he has an agenda.

Enough said.

[drHirudo]

The only reason to why you made that post was to shoot the messenger by trying to discredit him. It was completely off topic. Everyone can see that. And everyone can see that the PA6T performs just the same, despite your post, so it had zero impact! :lol:

He has already discredited himself in the past so many times. No need to discredit him. My post was a sarcasm. People already know where he comes from and what he tries to achieve.

The PA6T may perform the same, which is no wonder, considering it is chip developed some years ago. But the PA6T consumes much less power, which is relevant for people like me who are paying the electricity bills by themselves. Hmm, may be I shall create electricity consumptions benchmarks.

[drHirudo]

That sounds interesting. I wouldn't mind seeing that.

Yet another interesting calculation would be:

How long you need to keep your X1000 on for it to "pay the difference in initial cost", compared to f.ex. earlier higher end A1 models (other OS4 choices), Mac Mini (what it was ported for but not released), higher end PowerMacs (including G5) and PowerBooks (what OS4 could run on "relatively easily")

Also could throw in "same spec" X86 as that's what some people will start demanding right away :lol:

I bought my microA1 back in January 2005. Works flawlessly till now. Thats 89 months. Oh well, I had to buy $3 battery and replace it two months ago.


Bought in July 2011 Dell Inspiron laptop. It broke in December and in February 2012 I returned it back and had to pay extra to get another laptop from another brand.

So far the ALL the Amiga hardware I have performs good. That includes the old machines.