Harrods Parking space for Sale

[Fade]

@ KennyR
"It should be taken from them for being greedy and turned into a disabled person parking space."
-----------------

KennyR, why not take your opinion to its logical conclusion.

There are thousands of couples that for one reason or another cannot have children. And as TPG points out, anyone with too much of something, is a "retard", and sumner7 points out that those without, "deserve it more", so shouldn't we take some children away from those undeserving retarded parents with too many children and redistribute them to the more deserving childless couples?

As everything is relative, shouldn't we take say 20% of the housing from single people hogging all that space to themselves, and redistribute it to the more deserving non-retarded couples.

Wow, there's tons of stuff we can redistribute: :idea:
Withhold food from the fat, give to the thin.
One good eye from the seeing, give to the blind.
One girlfriend from the lucky stud, give to the horney.

[Fade]

KennyR, you always assume that anyone that is rich, got that way by stealing from the poor. That's the Socialist Way, isn't it?

One of these days, you will have more assets than you do today. What will you say then?

[Fade]

KennyR, don't you have multiple computers? Those without a computer might consider you greedy and probably stole those extra ones from the poor.

You only need one computer, so why haven't you redistributed all the others to the less fortunate?

[Fade]

@ TPG
"I fail to see the relevance, however. Owning more than one computer is hardly extravagant."
-------------------------

But it is all relative.
And you have just pointed it out by saying "Owning more than one computer is hardly extravagant."

To say such, only means, you or Kenny can afford mutiple computers, and you don't think it is extravagant to do so.

My point is, don't assume a rich person is a thief, only because he is rich, because he is only rich relative to a poorer person!

[Fade]

@ cecilia
"some dickhead being able to afford"
---------------

What logic!
Someone being able to afford a high priced item, makes them a dickhead.

Guess what that makes everyone who ever chose an A4000 over an A1200, or is waiting around to buy the new A1 when (if ever) OS4 is released?

Everyone knows you can buy a more powerfull computer at 1/3 the price of an A1.

I would also point out that all it takes to produce a piece of art is a piece of paper, some charcoal and talent. All the rest, the high priced oils, the canvas, the easel, brushes, etc. etc. is just showing off your opulence, and might be considered "the height of utter stupidity."

See, it is all relative. But maybe that is something a liberal can't understand. :-P

[Fade]

@ T_Bone
"Oh, I see what you're getting at, you think people that have money should give it away instead of spending it."
------------------

No he doesn't! He only wants the very rich ones to do it.

[Fade]

@ TPG
"by donating it to a charity, not by buying a parking space."

[Fade]

@ cecilia
"If Oils, etc really were "high priced", no artists would be able to afford them. they ceretainly are cheaper than a parking space."
--------------------

So I guess you are finally admitting it is just relative after all.

[Fade]

@ TGP

Fade wrote:
"by donating it to a charity, not by buying a parking space."


Would you care to elaborate on that? Your point's about as clear as dog poo.
-------------------------

No Fade did NOT write the above statement!

That was your statement TPG.

and later T_Bone stated

"Oh, I see what you're getting at, you think people that have money should give it away instead of spending it."
------------------
And then Fade wrote
No he doesn't! He only wants the very rich ones to do it.

Please dont ask me to explain YOUR statement.

[Fade]

At what point does a person get to spend their own money the way they want to, without someone else thinking they're greedy?


$200,000__/__$100,000__/__$75,000__/__$50,000__/__$25,000__/__$10,000__?__

[Fade]

@ TPG
"If you had quoted properly, they would appear in a proper quote box."
--------------

Sorry bout that, but none of the stuff on the posting page seems to work with AOS or at least IBrowse. Even the copy and paste drops the quote box.

Maybe I need to use a PC, as most folks seem to do here.

[Fade]

@ KennyR
"Can't you see that?"
-----------------

That's why I put up that simple little chart.

Giving you a chance to put your foot in your own mouth.

But I doubt you will give an answer.

[Fade]

@ KennyR
"Spending your own money is not the issue, having so much you can spend so much so frivolously when most people can work hard 9-5, 7 days a week for 6 months to earn as much."
------------------

And if I decide to work 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 15 years, so I can get myself out of that $25.000 a year category, I am then supposed to feel guilty and give away say everything above $50,000?

Do you actually think people are that stupid?

And I was right about you not answering the little chart question.

[Fade]

@ KennyR
"Oh, and before anyone responds with, "How did self-made millionaires get their money then??" - I don't consider that to be earning. Earning is working. Period."
-----------------

No KennyR , you can't try to cover it up with that statement.

There are too many Sam Waltons and Bill Gates in this world. All born poor!

[Fade]

@ KennyR
"There are two ways to get money legally: exploitation of the workforce, and hard work."
-----------------

And just where does the hard working guy that ends up making a mint, turn into the exploiter?

$200,000__/__$100,000__/__$75,000__/__$50,000__/__$25,000__/$10,000__?__