Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Freetime and BogoMIPS benchmarks ;)  (Read 4371 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline StormLord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 233
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amimac.gr
Re: Freetime and BogoMIPS benchmarks ;)
« on: January 13, 2010, 05:16:33 PM »
its sure close in some circumstances, but my table from "real life" benchmarks are like that:
68000 7 = 8086 5
68020 14 A1200 no FAST = 286 12
68020 14 w/fastmem = 386DX 20
68030 16 = 386DX 16
68030 25 = 386DX 25
68030 40 = 386DX 40
68030 50 = 486SX 25
68040 25 = 486DX 33
68040 40 = 486DX2 66
68060 50 = pentium 90-100(no MMX type cpu)
 

Offline StormLord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 233
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amimac.gr
Re: Freetime and BogoMIPS benchmarks ;)
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2010, 06:00:01 PM »
Quote from: Gulliver;538085
@StormLord
an Amiga 3000 16mhz slower than an Amiga 1200 with fastmem? I believe you missed on that one. The other ones look reasonable :)


oups! forgot to edit this one!!!

68020@14 fast mem = 386@ 14
 

Offline StormLord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 233
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amimac.gr
Re: Freetime and BogoMIPS benchmarks ;)
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2010, 06:06:28 PM »
as i have seen, things are like this,

020 and 030 are the same speed as it comes to mhz per mhz, ofcourse there are 030's with more Mhz than 020's

040 is 4x faster than 030 in the same Mhz
a 040@25 is twice faster than 030@50

060 is about 2x than 040 in the same mhz because of the superscalar.


so 040 WAS a BIG progress!