Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Breakfast time condundrums  (Read 3804 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Breakfast time condundrums
« on: October 29, 2006, 01:38:40 PM »
I was having breakfast late, as you do on a sunday morning, and i noticed something a bit odd written on the jar of 60% fruit preserve.

Produced with 60g fruit per 100g.
Total sugar content 45g per 100g.

How does that work out? :crazy:

Am I having a slow day here or do Asda need to correct their labelling?

If anyone is interested, it's the Exotic Conserve from their 'Extra Special' range. Made from mango, guava, passion fruit and other goodies.. Brilliant stuff!  :pancake:
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2006, 01:55:47 PM »
Ah.. that would explain the use of the word "Total".

Still I'm sure they put it that way to confuse many sleepy heads. :-D
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2006, 02:29:54 PM »
Does a certain amout evaporate during the mixing process?
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2006, 02:31:47 PM »
Well I guess it's not as bad as those labels on packs of nuts proclaiming "This product may contain nuts" :lol:  :crazy:
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2006, 02:32:40 PM »
 
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Quote

GadgetMaster wrote:
Does a certain amout evaporate during the mixing process?


It could, but even assuming you did it in a closed container, the result would be less than 100ml ;-)


:inquisitive:  :inquisitive:
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2006, 02:49:12 PM »
Quote

Karlos wrote:

Gases have their own rules)


And smells  :lol:

.....now where did I put my coat
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2006, 02:50:07 PM »
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Quote

GadgetMaster wrote:
Does a certain amout evaporate during the mixing process?


It could, but even assuming you did it in a closed container, the result would be less than 100ml ;-)


Basically, all substances comprise of a certain amount of empty space (in strict terms, the vast majority is empty space but here were talking about intermolecular distances).

If you dissolve a certain volume of salt in water, there's no appreciable change in volume of the water. The dissociated ions are free to roam around the spaces between the H20 molecules (a very simplified picture there, but that's the gist). Overall, the volume has gotten less (ie the volume occupied by the salt has been lost), but the mass has stayed the same, ie, the liquid is denser.

When you mix water and alcohol, each one effectively partially "dissolves" into the other, resulting in a decrease in overall volume. As expected, mass is conserved, so a 50/50 mix is naturally more dense than pure alcohol, but less dense than the pure water.

To summarise it, you always observe conservation of mass, but conservation of volume is, in fact, rarely guarenteed (at least for liquids and solids - gases have their own rules)


Interesting stuff. I should have payed a little more attention in school :-D
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2006, 02:55:08 PM »
Quote

Karlos wrote:
Quote

GadgetMaster wrote:
Well I guess it's not as bad as those labels on packs of nuts proclaiming "This product may contain nuts" :lol:  :crazy:


Which surprises ordinary people and food industry experts allike, but each for different reasons ;-)


Yes, They are surprised that they actually included some natural ingredients in their products  :lol:
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2006, 11:34:27 PM »
You are right. It is confusing and completely wrong but the easy part I do know from where this strange use of language originates.

It is direct a translation from the urdu which doesn't quite work in English but is still used regardless. Open and close is used to describe the restrictions on eating and drinking hence when the fast starts the permission to eat ends or  "closes" (in Urdu).

In the evening the restrictions are lifted or "Opened" (again in Urdu)

I hope that made sense.
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2006, 11:50:00 PM »
Another common one is  "Reading" salah instead of offering or praying it. Again it is a direct translation from the Urdu where the word reading is quite acceptable. Just the oddities of languages and mistranslations really.
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2006, 12:04:45 AM »
Me too.. Guilty as charged :shrug:
 

Offline GadgetMasterTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2177
    • Show all replies
Re: Breakfast time condundrums
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2006, 12:17:13 AM »
Pajer?? .. shhhh that doesn't exist...  Now that black van man has the details of our  "Ultra secret" laire  :-o

You are right though . there have been some quite nice aditions to the emoticon ..er.. vocabulary here.