Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: PFS Vs SFS Which is better.  (Read 4146 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Paul

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
Re: PFS Vs SFS Which is better.
« on: October 14, 2003, 04:11:45 AM »
Quote
Anyway, I would like to know if anyone has thoughts as to SFS as i haven't tried this filesystem yet and I know it may be hard to get PFS now. Is SFS better than PFS?

Still, PFS, what a great filesystem :)


The fact that more people have experience (good ones at that!) with PFS than SFS might say something to answer your question! :-)

I ran PFS 2 & 3 on both my 4000 and on Frankenthousand. Never had a problem with either one.

For now, I plan to run PFS3 on a spare drive in my AmigaOne for backup purposes, while I evaluate FFS2 on the main drive.

(Oh. . . and no, I am not a beta tester, and don't have OS4 yet. I'm just talking about what I'll do once OS4 arrives. I'm stuck with Linux for now.)

Paul
Proud Builder of Frankenthousand, the monster A1000
The Young Frankenthousand - AmigaOne G4-XE, Catweasel, Radeon 9250, 2 GB, working MB sound, DMA and USB... now running OS4.1 update 3