Amiga Inc. back in court

[Tigger]

Aha! Maybe this is why they had to sell OS4? Anyway this should be an easy win

Yeah, Genesi will win this easy, thats what you meant right??  :-P   Actually this testimony isnt good for Bill McEwen, it now makes him a liar during his depositions, since the OS was sold on April 23rd 2003 (according to the press release, Garry says it was sold the 24th).   Either date is before his deposition on April 30th or his deposition on August 7th, thats going to weigh heavy with the judge, given Bill claimed that Amiga Inc owned AmigaOS 1.0 and up during both depositions.  This KMOS fiasco has every appearance of a shell game with the IP, and the judge is likely to greatly frown on it.  
     -Tig

[Tigger]

 think the judge will look upon Bill Bucks evidence supplied under perjory that he would have known was not reliable and yet he supplied it as fact, and which in fact turned out to be faked, and then Bill Buck did not inform the court of this. Perjury is a lot more important than a single day difference in a date (hell, could be timezones, could have been signed after an all-nighter, who knows).

First of all the person that is going to get convicted of perjury is Bill McEwen.  In two seperate depositions (April 30th & August 7th) he said that Amiga Inc owned AmigaOS (all versions from 1.0 - 3.9) as part of a search for Amiga Inc assets.  Having it now become known that Amiga Inc sold the OS on April 23 or 24th, this is going to be a pretty big issue.  In both depositions, Bill McEwen lied about the ownership of AmigaOS, all that will happen with Bill Bucks usage of what is now believed to be a fake email from Fleecy, is that data will not be used, that doesnt hurt there case at all, McEwen lying about the ownership of assets is a huge issue.  
    -Tig