Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: nfs vs samba  (Read 2852 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show all replies
Re: nfs vs samba
« on: January 25, 2006, 04:26:59 PM »
It really depends on what you want to connect/connect to.  NFS is superior in speed, overhead, etc. but if you need to connect to a Windows box, you'll probably be limited to Samba (unless the PC has additional software).  You can use both at the same time though.
Logged
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 

Offline adolescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 3056
    • Show all replies
Re: nfs vs samba
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2006, 02:12:55 AM »
But wow!  Look at that CPU%.  Is that correct, is the NFS client is taking 100% CPU!?  How was the system response while diskspeed was running?

Also, what's the discrepancy with the buffers.  Can you add buffers to the NFS device?
Logged
Time to move on.  Bye Amiga.org.  :(
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »