Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amithlon vs. IcAros  (Read 5295 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mpiva

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 297
    • Show all replies
    • http://members.shaw.ca/michpiva
Re: Amithlon vs. IcAros
« on: September 08, 2009, 03:01:56 PM »
Quote from: stefcep2;522413
Hmmm, so you, like me, see the value of a fast booting OS.  The consensus of opinion by the intelligentsia here is that a fast boot is unnecessary, as you can juts leave your PC in standby indefinately, never ever turning it off.  Despite this its odd how often someone comes along and thinks a fast boot is A Good Thing.


Standby is fine for desktops but when it comes to laptops, I'd much rather power down to save my battery.  Coincidentally, using a laptop is precisely the time when fast boot time is desirable.  When you only have a 15min coffee break, a 30sec boot time is 29sec too long. :D

I used to use Amithlon on my laptop all the time.  Unfortunately I've got a newer laptop and Amithlon doesn't really work on it.  :(  I sure wish Amithlon had never died. Personally I think Amiga Inc should have snatched up Amithlon and used it as a migratory path to AmigaOS 4.0 for x86 instead of going the PPC route.  But that's just my opinion and I hope this thread doesn't degrade into some "PPC vs x86" flamewar just because I stated my opinion.
-- Michael A. Piva --


"In engineering, there is no single truth, no one right answer; there\'s a canvas, and you paint it your way, only with chips or gates or subroutines rather than actual paint. That\'s the Amiga..."
-Dave Haynie