LoadWB wrote:
But he does say (paraphrase) that this is a shareware/freeware version of OS3.9, so there's no licensing violations.
I'd like to hear his explanation of that.
Umm, that's not the way I understand it.
From the write-up:
It has received both criticism and praise; criticism for being a 'shareware/freeware' upgrade...
All he's saying is that a lot of people have criticized OS3.9 as being OS3.1 with a lot of shareware/freeware programs preinstalled on it. I've heard people say this too. They'll say, "Don't buy OS3.9 as everything "new" on OS3.9 can be downloaded from Aminet anyway.
I still think OS3.9 is worth the buy, though. I own a copy.
