Hi all!
"i am sooo looking forward to this issue, dont know why but the quality has been so damn good in the earlier issues."
it's because we have a few new names in the pool of resources and they've been giving advice on layout.
The other main reason is that as Rob puts together the new mags he is providing us contributors with PDFs of the WIP so that we can check it over for mistakes.
I have personally been through every single article in issue 16 and proofread it for mistakes (spelling, how it reads etc), and there are several other contributors who have checked a lot of the articles for mistakes and have seen stuff I didnt. So all told if you can find any mistakes in this latest issue then it's a fluke and cause I was bone tired from all that reading and checking!!! ;-)
Enjoy the issue! I've read it, I've written for it (Divided Loyalties, Historical Similarities; TOT update; MOS1.4 Review) and its a bloody good read.
TTFN All!
Bifford
