That's pretty close what actually happened in the late 90's. Amiga Inc. approached the MorphOS developers to ask them about making their OS the new AmigaOS. They talked about it, got a contract they couldn't agree on and Amiga Inc. found Hyperion instead. So if things had been a little different, we would all have used MorphOS as AmigaOS today. Makes you think, doesn't it 
Amiga Inc. wanted to outsource the development and own the source. Hyperion's problem was accepting the low amount Amiga Inc. paid them ($25,000) to develop the OS. I suspect that they'll try this again when Hyperion goes bankrupt but OS4 is obsolete and needs to be replaced the same way Apple replaced their classic version of MacOS with OSX after they bought over NeXTSTEP and brought back Steve Jobs.
MorphOS has nothing to lose and everything to gain in a deal with A-Eon. They could continue to sell MorphOS for PowerPC systems and a version called AmigaOS with added features and software for A-Cube and A-Eon. Even at the lowest price MorphOS sells their operating system (around $75 for one EfikaPPC system) they would make $15,000 if A-Eon even sells 200 and $30,000 for the same amount of computers sold if they were charging the same price Hyperion charges for each X1000 sold.
This is one person's opinion, but not so rich men spend 3 grand on gaming rigs to squeak an extra frame per second out of a game all the time; so the Amiga should be the hobby of only the poor, the uneducated, the huddled masses?
And for less than 3 grand they get a modern and more technologically advanced computer that can play the latest games, not a $3,000 paperweight that was obsolete almost a decade ago and that can't even run the latest software let alone the latest games.
at least 200 people disagree. and the X1000 isn't 3000EUR. oh, and for the record, i bought my first system for less than $600. my next machine was only $400. that may be expensive in your eyes, but it wasn't in mine. please don't take your feelings, project them on everyone else, and then draw false conclusions.
-- eliyahu
O_o Seriously? And yet you don't see the problem here? I'm sorry but how likely do you think someone is to develop new software for a user base of 200?